City of Snohomish

U.S. Representative, 1st District

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Suzan DelBenePrefers Democratic Party
• Mary SilvaPrefers Republican Party

State Senator, 44th Legislative District

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Sherri LarkinPrefers Republican Party
• John LovickPrefers Democratic Party

State Representative, 44th Legislative District · Position 1

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Chris ElderPrefers Republican Party
• Brandy DonaghyPrefers Democratic Party

State Representative, 44th Legislative District · Position 2

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Tonya StadlmanPrefers Republican Party
• April BergPrefers Democratic Party

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 1, Unexpired 2-year term

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Scott EdwardsNo party listed
• Colleen MelodyNo party listed

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 3

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• David StevensNo party listed
• Jaime Michelle HawkNo party listed

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 4

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Ian BirkNo party listed
• Sean O'DonnellNo party listed

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 5, Unexpired 2-year term

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Dave LarsonNo party listed
• Theo AngelisNo party listed

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 7

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Todd A. BloomNo party listed
• Debra L. StephensNo party listed

Judge, Court of Appeals, Division I, District 2 · Position 2

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Linda CoburnNo party listed

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Cascade District, Position 1

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Jennifer RancourtNo party listed

Only part of City of Snohomish votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Cascade District, Position 2

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Rachelle FrancisNo party listed

Only part of City of Snohomish votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Everett District, Position 1

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Anthony E. HowardNo party listed

Only part of City of Snohomish votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Everett District, Position 2, Short and full term

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Jennifer MillettNo party listed

Only part of City of Snohomish votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Evergreen District, Position 1

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Rick LeoNo party listed

Only part of City of Snohomish votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Evergreen District, Position 2

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Patricia LyonNo party listed

Only part of City of Snohomish votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · South District, Position 1

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Elizabeth FraserNo party listed

Only part of City of Snohomish votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · South District, Position 2

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Jeffrey D. GoodwinNo party listed

Only part of City of Snohomish votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · South District, Position 3

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Matthew BaldockNo party listed

Only part of City of Snohomish votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Jason CummingsPrefers Democratic Party

Snohomish County PUD No. 1 Commissioner · District 1

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Sid LoganNo party listed
• Janet St ClairNo party listed

Initiative Measure No. IP26-645: repeal the 9.9% tax on income over $1 million; prohibit income taxes

Initiative Measure No. IP26-645 concerns state and local taxes. This measure would repeal a 9.9% tax on annual individual income over $1,000,000; prohibit taxes measured by individual income and taxes on individual income or the receipt of individual income; and define "income." This measure would decrease funding for public K-12 education, higher education (including universities and community colleges), and human services (primarily healthcare). Should this measure be enacted into law?

Initiative Measure No. IL26-001: parents' rights in public schools (restore Initiative 2081 as enacted)

Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerns parental rights relating to their children in public school. This measure would repeal amendments to a statute listing certain rights of parents and guardians of public-school children and re-enact the law as it was originally enacted by Initiative to the Legislature 2081. Should this measure be enacted into law?

Initiative Measure No. IL26-638: K-12 girls' sports eligibility and biological sex verification

Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 concerns participation in athletics at K-12 schools. This measure would prohibit students it defines as "biologically male" from competing in certain school athletic activities intended for female students only. It would require verification of biological sex by students' healthcare providers. Should this measure be enacted into law?

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 1: foundational government services policy

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 1 Adoption of a Foundational Government Services Policy The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning a policy to provide for, and sustain, core public services. This proposition would require the county legislature and executive branch to prioritize and protect funding for the offices of county Assessor, Auditor, Clerk, Executive, Prosecuting Attorney, Sheriff, Treasurer, and the District and Superior Court Judges. This proposition would add a new section to Article 6 of the County Charter. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 2: budget stabilization funds

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 2 Prioritize Funding of Budget Stabilization Funds The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning the prioritization of the county budget stabilization funds. This proposition would require the county legislature and executive branch to prioritize the funding of the county budget stabilization funds. The purpose of these funds is to help mitigate the impacts of catastrophic economic downturns and revenue shortfalls and provide resources for emergencies and catastrophic events. This proposition would add a new section to Article 6 of the County Charter. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 3: make all county offices nonpartisan

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 3 Converting All Elected County Offices to Non-partisan Offices The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning non-partisanship in all elected county offices. This proposition would require that all candidates for a Snohomish County elected office appear on the ballot without a political party designation and that all elected county offices be non-partisan offices. This proposition would amend Section 4.15 and Section 4.80 of the County Charter. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 4: public access to county financial information

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 4 Increasing Public Access to County Financial Transparency The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning the availability of public access to county financial information. This proposition would add a new section to Article 6 of the Snohomish County Charter. This proposition requires Snohomish County to make available, where reasonably practicable through existing systems or future modernization efforts, all financial information legally available within the county. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 5: 4/5 Council vote to raise taxes

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 5 Requiring a 4/5 Supermajority Council Vote to Increase Taxes The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning the approval of tax increases by the County Council. This proposition would require a 4/5 supermajority council vote to assess, levy, or increase any councilmanic tax. This proposition would amend Section 2.20 of the County Charter. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Fire District 10 Proposition 1: annex into Shoreline Fire Regional Fire Authority

Fire Protection District No. 10 Proposition No. 1 Annexation Into Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority The Board of Commissioners of Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 10 has approved Resolution No. 2026-02 concerning an annexation into Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority. This proposition would authorize Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 10 to annex into Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority to provide fire and emergency medical services effective March 1, 2027, as described in the Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority plan amendment attached to Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 10 Resolution No. 2026-02. Should this proposition be:

Only part of City of Snohomish votes on this. Enter your address to know for sure.

Hospital District 1 Proposition 1: $382M bonds for replacement Monroe hospital

Public Hospital District No. 1 Proposition No. 1 Bonds for New Replacement Hospital The Commission of Public Hospital District No. 1, Snohomish County, Washington (EvergreenHealth Monroe), adopted Resolution No. 2026-04 concerning a proposition for a replacement hospital and related healthcare facilities. If approved, this proposition would authorize the District to construct and equip a new replacement hospital and carry out other capital improvements deemed necessary or advisable by the Commission to address the healthcare needs of the community; issue no more than $382,000,000.00 of general obligation bonds maturing within 30 years; and levy annual excess property taxes to repay the bonds, all as provided in Resolution 2026-04. Should this proposition be:

Only part of City of Snohomish votes on this. Enter your address to know for sure.

South County Fire Proposition 1: $420M fire station bonds

South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue Regional Fire Authority Proposition No. 1 Fire and Emergency Medical Services Construction General Obligation Bonds - $420,000,000 The Board of Fire Commissioners of the South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue Regional Fire Authority adopted Resolution No. 06092026-13 concerning financing for its capital facilities plan. This proposition would authorize South County Fire to replace, renovate and/or make seismic upgrades to aging fire stations, build additional fire stations, and construct, improve, acquire and/or equip facilities to meet the community's emergency response needs, enhance reliability, reduce coverage gaps, and support operations; issue up to $420,000,000 of general obligation bonds maturing within a maximum of 25 years; and levy annual excess property taxes to repay the bonds, as provided in Resolution No. 06092026-13. Should Proposition No. 1 be:

Only part of City of Snohomish votes on this. Enter your address to know for sure.