City of Everett

U.S. Representative, 2nd District

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Rick LarsenPrefers Democratic Party
• Edwin H. FellerPrefers Republican Party

State Senator, 21st Legislative District

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Marko LiiasPrefers Democratic Party
• Riaz KhanPrefers Republican Party

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

State Senator, 38th Legislative District

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Brad BenderPrefers Republican Party
• June RobinsonPrefers Democratic Party

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

State Senator, 44th Legislative District

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Sherri LarkinPrefers Republican Party
• John LovickPrefers Democratic Party

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

State Representative, 21st Legislative District · Position 1

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Strom PetersonPrefers Democratic Party
• Jason MoonPrefers Democratic Party

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

State Representative, 21st Legislative District · Position 2

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Lillian Ortiz-SelfPrefers Democratic Party
• Bruce GuthriePrefers Libertarian Party

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

State Representative, 38th Legislative District · Position 1

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Thomas (Jeff) KellyPrefers Cascade Party
• Julio CortesPrefers Democratic Party

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

State Representative, 38th Legislative District · Position 2

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Mary FossePrefers Democratic Party

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

State Representative, 44th Legislative District · Position 1

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Chris ElderPrefers Republican Party
• Brandy DonaghyPrefers Democratic Party

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

State Representative, 44th Legislative District · Position 2

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Tonya StadlmanPrefers Republican Party
• April BergPrefers Democratic Party

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 1, Unexpired 2-year term

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Scott EdwardsNo party listed
• Colleen MelodyNo party listed

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 3

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• David StevensNo party listed
• Jaime Michelle HawkNo party listed

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 4

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Ian BirkNo party listed
• Sean O'DonnellNo party listed

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 5, Unexpired 2-year term

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Dave LarsonNo party listed
• Theo AngelisNo party listed

Justice, Washington Supreme Court · Position 7

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Todd A. BloomNo party listed
• Debra L. StephensNo party listed

Judge, Court of Appeals, Division I, District 2 · Position 2

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Linda CoburnNo party listed

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Cascade District, Position 1

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Jennifer RancourtNo party listed

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Cascade District, Position 2

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Rachelle FrancisNo party listed

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Everett District, Position 1

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Anthony E. HowardNo party listed

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Everett District, Position 2, Short and full term

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Jennifer MillettNo party listed

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Evergreen District, Position 1

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Rick LeoNo party listed

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · Evergreen District, Position 2

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Patricia LyonNo party listed

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · South District, Position 1

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Elizabeth FraserNo party listed

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · South District, Position 2

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Jeffrey D. GoodwinNo party listed

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County District Court Judge · South District, Position 3

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Matthew BaldockNo party listed

Only part of City of Everett votes in this race. Enter your address to know for sure.

Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney

Vote for 1 · 1 candidate

• Jason CummingsPrefers Democratic Party

Snohomish County PUD No. 1 Commissioner · District 1

Vote for 1 · 2 candidates

• Sid LoganNo party listed
• Janet St ClairNo party listed

Initiative Measure No. IP26-645: repeal the 9.9% tax on income over $1 million; prohibit income taxes

Initiative Measure No. IP26-645 concerns state and local taxes. This measure would repeal a 9.9% tax on annual individual income over $1,000,000; prohibit taxes measured by individual income and taxes on individual income or the receipt of individual income; and define "income." This measure would decrease funding for public K-12 education, higher education (including universities and community colleges), and human services (primarily healthcare). Should this measure be enacted into law?

Initiative Measure No. IL26-001: parents' rights in public schools (restore Initiative 2081 as enacted)

Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerns parental rights relating to their children in public school. This measure would repeal amendments to a statute listing certain rights of parents and guardians of public-school children and re-enact the law as it was originally enacted by Initiative to the Legislature 2081. Should this measure be enacted into law?

Initiative Measure No. IL26-638: K-12 girls' sports eligibility and biological sex verification

Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 concerns participation in athletics at K-12 schools. This measure would prohibit students it defines as "biologically male" from competing in certain school athletic activities intended for female students only. It would require verification of biological sex by students' healthcare providers. Should this measure be enacted into law?

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 1: foundational government services policy

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 1 Adoption of a Foundational Government Services Policy The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning a policy to provide for, and sustain, core public services. This proposition would require the county legislature and executive branch to prioritize and protect funding for the offices of county Assessor, Auditor, Clerk, Executive, Prosecuting Attorney, Sheriff, Treasurer, and the District and Superior Court Judges. This proposition would add a new section to Article 6 of the County Charter. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 2: budget stabilization funds

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 2 Prioritize Funding of Budget Stabilization Funds The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning the prioritization of the county budget stabilization funds. This proposition would require the county legislature and executive branch to prioritize the funding of the county budget stabilization funds. The purpose of these funds is to help mitigate the impacts of catastrophic economic downturns and revenue shortfalls and provide resources for emergencies and catastrophic events. This proposition would add a new section to Article 6 of the County Charter. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 3: make all county offices nonpartisan

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 3 Converting All Elected County Offices to Non-partisan Offices The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning non-partisanship in all elected county offices. This proposition would require that all candidates for a Snohomish County elected office appear on the ballot without a political party designation and that all elected county offices be non-partisan offices. This proposition would amend Section 4.15 and Section 4.80 of the County Charter. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 4: public access to county financial information

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 4 Increasing Public Access to County Financial Transparency The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning the availability of public access to county financial information. This proposition would add a new section to Article 6 of the Snohomish County Charter. This proposition requires Snohomish County to make available, where reasonably practicable through existing systems or future modernization efforts, all financial information legally available within the county. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Snohomish County Charter Proposition 5: 4/5 Council vote to raise taxes

Proposed Amendments to the Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 5 Requiring a 4/5 Supermajority Council Vote to Increase Taxes The Snohomish County Charter Review Commission has proposed an amendment to the county charter concerning the approval of tax increases by the County Council. This proposition would require a 4/5 supermajority council vote to assess, levy, or increase any councilmanic tax. This proposition would amend Section 2.20 of the County Charter. Should this proposition be enacted into law:

Fire District 10 Proposition 1: annex into Shoreline Fire Regional Fire Authority

Fire Protection District No. 10 Proposition No. 1 Annexation Into Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority The Board of Commissioners of Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 10 has approved Resolution No. 2026-02 concerning an annexation into Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority. This proposition would authorize Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 10 to annex into Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority to provide fire and emergency medical services effective March 1, 2027, as described in the Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority plan amendment attached to Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 10 Resolution No. 2026-02. Should this proposition be:

Only part of City of Everett votes on this. Enter your address to know for sure.

Hospital District 1 Proposition 1: $382M bonds for replacement Monroe hospital

Public Hospital District No. 1 Proposition No. 1 Bonds for New Replacement Hospital The Commission of Public Hospital District No. 1, Snohomish County, Washington (EvergreenHealth Monroe), adopted Resolution No. 2026-04 concerning a proposition for a replacement hospital and related healthcare facilities. If approved, this proposition would authorize the District to construct and equip a new replacement hospital and carry out other capital improvements deemed necessary or advisable by the Commission to address the healthcare needs of the community; issue no more than $382,000,000.00 of general obligation bonds maturing within 30 years; and levy annual excess property taxes to repay the bonds, all as provided in Resolution 2026-04. Should this proposition be:

Only part of City of Everett votes on this. Enter your address to know for sure.

South County Fire Proposition 1: $420M fire station bonds

South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue Regional Fire Authority Proposition No. 1 Fire and Emergency Medical Services Construction General Obligation Bonds - $420,000,000 The Board of Fire Commissioners of the South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue Regional Fire Authority adopted Resolution No. 06092026-13 concerning financing for its capital facilities plan. This proposition would authorize South County Fire to replace, renovate and/or make seismic upgrades to aging fire stations, build additional fire stations, and construct, improve, acquire and/or equip facilities to meet the community's emergency response needs, enhance reliability, reduce coverage gaps, and support operations; issue up to $420,000,000 of general obligation bonds maturing within a maximum of 25 years; and levy annual excess property taxes to repay the bonds, as provided in Resolution No. 06092026-13. Should Proposition No. 1 be:

Only part of City of Everett votes on this. Enter your address to know for sure.

Mukilteo School District Proposition 1: $400M school construction bonds

Mukilteo School District No. 6 Proposition No. 1 General Obligation Bonds - $400,000,000 The Board of Directors of Mukilteo School District No. 6 adopted Resolution #12/2025-26 concerning a proposition for bonds. This proposition would authorize the District to add to and replace portions of Mukilteo, Serene Lake and Olivia Park Elementaries and Explorer Middle School; expand the Kamiak High School gymnasium; replace and improve track, field and athletic facilities; update technology systems; make safety and security upgrades; and upgrade building components, by issuing $400,000,000 of general obligation bonds maturing within 21 years; and to levy excess property taxes annually to repay the bonds, as described in Resolution #12/2025-26. Should this proposition be approved?

Only part of City of Everett votes on this. Enter your address to know for sure.

City of Everett Proposition 261: candidate residency, no dual elected office

City of Everett Proposition No. 261 Amendment to Everett City Charter Sections 2.2 and 4.10 The amendment to Section 2.2 would require candidates for Mayor and City Council to have registered to vote in the City of Everett and resided in the City (and district if applicable) for at least one year before the deadline for filing for office; and would prohibit elected officials from holding other elected offices simultaneously. Finally, Section 4.10 would be amended to only require elected officials to take an official oath of office. Should these amendments to the Everett City Charter be enacted into law?

City of Everett Proposition 262: council meeting schedule and presiding officer

City of Everett Proposition No. 262 Amendment to Everett City Charter Section 3.2 The amendment to Section 3.2 would require the City to have at least two council meetings per month and at least 36 meetings per year; require the City to publish a schedule of those meetings every year in January and revise the procedures for determining who will preside over meetings when the Council President is absent. Should this amendment to the Everett City Charter be enacted into law?

City of Everett Proposition 263: limit civil service rules to police and fire hiring

City of Everett Proposition No. 263 Amendment to Everett City Charter Section 8.3 The amendment to Section 8.3 would revise the City's Civil Service rules so that the Civil Service Commission's responsibilities are consistent with the requirements of state law. Should this amendment to the Everett City Charter be enacted into law?

City of Everett Proposition 264: initiative and referendum signature rules

City of Everett Proposition No. 264 Amendment to Four Sections of the Everett City Charter The amendment to Sections 11.1, 11.2, 11.3 and 11.5 would require an initiative or referendum petition be signed by qualified electors in a number equal to ten percent of the total number of votes cast at the last preceding Mayoral election; would allow for 10 days to correct faulty signatures; would streamline the initiative process; and would require the City to prepare a Fiscal Analysis of the measure that would be made available to voters. Should these amendments to the Everett City Charter be enacted into law?

City of Everett Proposition 265: publish public notices on city website

City of Everett Proposition No. 265 Amendment to Eight Sections of the Everett City Charter The Amendments to Sections 3.4, 3.5, 4.13, 11.6, 13.9, 15.5, 16.2, and 16.3 would modernize how the City provides the public notice by allowing the City to publish those notices, appointments, ordinances and proposed ordinances, proposed initiatives and referenda, bid advertisements, and franchise on City's website instead of requiring this information to be published in a newspaper, while also having this information available in the office of the City Clerk for examination by the public. Should these amendments to the Everett City Charter be enacted into law?